Listen: there's a hell of a good universe next door, let's go

  Relying on technology to hear means that though you get current and top of the line equipment, research continues and new models get released and before you know it, your cool new tech is old. I had a version of that going on when I was using hearing aids too - I'd get new ones on average every five years, and every time I did I was amazed at how much better they were - and it was a good think too, because my hearing was degrading.  For a while it felt as though they kept up with better performance, but then of course they didn't, and I ended up getting implanted. And if I'm honest, my processors have been wonderful, they gave me better hearing than I ever though I'd have again.  They sounded good - I listen to music whenever I'm in the car (well, mostly when I'm in the car alone), and they're reliable.  I was provided with all kinds of replacement parts in case I needed them, and the only things I've had to buy were filter covers (for the air filters ...

  Last year I drove into the city a couple of times to participate in some studies being done at the University of Minnesota that were designed to help the researchers understand how people with hearing impairments - and specifically, cochlear implant recipients - fill in the blanks, so to speak, when the speech they're hearing isn't understandable. Knowing how we can successfully fill in those blanks better from context could lead to the development of ways to help CI users develop that ability.   Today I received an email from the audiologist that I worked with in the study, and she sent me a link to the paper that they published.  I'll admit that so far I've just skimmed it but just receiving it, knowing that this study, this learning, could result in better speech comprehension results for people with CIs is just wonderful.  I've been lucky enough to participate in studies to improve cochlear implants themselves, at the MedEl offices in North Carolina, and now h...